RealCADD 4.21b1

2D CAD software for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux
Post Reply
Eric Pousse
Posts: 730
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 12:31 pm
Location: Tours - France

RealCADD 4.21b1

Post by Eric Pousse » Sun May 20, 2012 4:40 pm

Bonjour,

A beta version of RealCADD 4.21 is available.
This version fixes the limit (127 pixels) of the size of the texts.
The new handles introduced in v4.20 are now displayed when the key "alt" or "option" is down when you move the mouse.
I have made also some internal changes to prepare a new version of the tool that I use to write RealCADD.
So some bugs can be found.

To download it :
http://www.adx-online.com/RealCADD_Mac_421b1.zip
http://www.adx-online.com/RealCADD_Windows_421b1.zip
http://www.adx-online.com/RealCADD_Linux_421b1.zip

Thanks
Eric Pousse

debenriver
Posts: 513
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Maine USA and Suffolk England
Contact:

Re: RealCADD 4.21b1

Post by debenriver » Tue May 22, 2012 1:05 pm

Hi Eric

I downloaded the beta version. All looks good so far! No bugs yet. Thank you for making the changes :D

George

debenriver
Posts: 513
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Maine USA and Suffolk England
Contact:

Re: RealCADD 4.21b1

Post by debenriver » Thu May 24, 2012 11:54 pm

Hi Eric

Actually I do seem to have a bug with parallel lines. If I put in, say, 800mm, when I click the line to make a parallel line, it goes to 0.8mm. If I click again it seems to go to 0.008mm. Then if I click again it goes to 8mm. Then another click makes it go to 1mm. Then 0.001mm and so on. So clicking the parallel line tool is changing the parallel settings (which you normally access by option-click). It does produce a parallel line, but very close to the original as the changed settings would suggest. I haven't tried it with a real big number - say 8000mm or 80000mm - or with any other numbers other than 8 (because that is what I was doing when I noticed the problem). I will go and see what happens.

:D :D

George

debenriver
Posts: 513
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Maine USA and Suffolk England
Contact:

Re: RealCADD 4.21b1

Post by debenriver » Thu May 24, 2012 11:59 pm

OK - so 8000 produces 8 and 9000 produces 9. And I think .008 produced .000008 or something - but it looked like 1 - but it was actually 1 x e-6.

I think I'll go back to 4.20 just for the moment ..... Productivity has taken a dive into very small numbers!

Best

George

Eric Pousse
Posts: 730
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 12:31 pm
Location: Tours - France

Re: RealCADD 4.21b1

Post by Eric Pousse » Sat May 26, 2012 12:10 pm

OK George, it is fixed, thanks !
Eric Pousse

Post Reply